Blogs

Gemini 3 and Antigravity IDE dropped. Wonder why every AI vendor is chasing AI coding? Because input tokens are a 95%‑margin business, and that same equation can reshape whose AI prints profit vs burns cash. Are you building on ground where token economics work for you or against you? The answer lies in a margin secret most teams ignore.

If your AI lives in vendor silos, you're building someone else's competitive advantage with your customers, workflows, and edge cases. That's not strategy. That's asset transfer. Sales conversations in Vendor A. Support in Vendor B. Analytics in Vendor C. Each vendor accumulates intelligence about your business. Switch vendors? Intelligence resets to zero. In 1995, companies treated websites as brochures. By 2005, those without accumulated data couldn't compete. The same pattern is happening with AI right now. The question isn't whether to use AI tools. It's who owns the intelligence when it compounds.

I automated my role, then rebuilt teams: all-elite, AI-native. Replaced mid-tier devs with AI protocols. Every remaining person is a disruptor. Small beats bloated!

Why are your top-ranking pages getting 34.5% fewer clicks? AI Overviews are answering questions before users reach your site. GEO/AEO optimization gets you cited as the authoritative source. Transform from "best on the list" to "the answer AI quotes"

Whether your AI "is an agent" is the wrong question — the right question is how agentic it needs to be for your specific use case. Your trading desk needs zero-ambiguity entity resolution; your research team needs creative exploration; your compliance docs need audit trails. Generic SaaS picks that balance for the broadest market, not your risk tolerance. The gap between flashy demos and production systems that auditors trust? That's where customization lives, and it's the only moat that compounds.​​